Temporal vs Inngest vs Trigger.dev vs Restate
All four exist to solve the same problem: work that spans minutes or hours, across process restarts, without writing a state machine by hand. They differ on where that state lives.
Short answer
If your stack is TypeScript, Inngest or Trigger.dev will be live in a day and cover 90% of agent workloads.
By Lattice editorial · Licence and cost facts verified · method
- TemporalThe reference implementation. Event history, maximal durability.
- InngestTypeScript-native, event-driven step functions.
- Trigger.devBackground jobs with long-running task support.
- RestateLow-latency durable API surface.
| Dimension | Temporal | Inngest | Trigger.dev | Restate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Languages | Go, Java, Python, TypeScript, .NET, PHP | TypeScript | TypeScript, Python | Java, Kotlin, Rust, TypeScript, Python |
| Durability model | Full event history, deterministic replay | Step-function journal, replay from step | Checkpointed runs, resumable tasks | Single log per invocation |
| Self-host required | Usually — or use Temporal Cloud | No — cloud is the default path | No | No |
| Streaming / low latency | Not its strength | Good | Good | Best in class |
| Where it loses | Heaviest to adopt, largest surface | TypeScript only | Narrower language coverage | Youngest ecosystem, smallest community |
Scroll the table sideways to see every tool.
What this table is not. These are editorial judgements, not benchmarks: Lattice has not run these tools head to head, and no cell uses GitHub stars or vendor benchmark claims as evidence. Licence and cost facts are re-checked on a schedule the build enforces — the receipt is public.
The recommendation
Which should you choose: Temporal, Inngest, Trigger.dev or Restate?
If your stack is TypeScript, Inngest or Trigger.dev will be live in a day and cover 90% of agent workloads. If you are polyglot or durability is the centre of your business, Temporal is the mature answer and you should accept the adoption cost. Restate is the one to watch if low-latency stateful endpoints matter more than ecosystem size.
Rules of thumb
- Adopt one of these specifically so an agent loop survives a deploy. A process restart mid-loop is the most common way agents cause real damage.
- The engine fixes durability, not idempotency. Side-effecting tool calls still need idempotency keys.
- Put turn, token and wall-clock ceilings in the host. A prompt is a suggestion; the engine is a control.
Quick answers
- When should you use Temporal, and when should you skip it?
- Use Temporal when: work spanning minutes or hours that must survive restarts and retries. Skip it when: you need it live in a day — the adoption cost is real.
- When should you use Inngest, and when should you skip it?
- Use Inngest when: durable step functions in TypeScript, without running the engine. Skip it when: you are not working in TypeScript.
- When should you use Trigger.dev, and when should you skip it?
- Use Trigger.dev when: long-running background jobs that must survive a deploy. Skip it when: you need more than TypeScript.
- When should you use Restate, and when should you skip it?
- Use Restate when: durable execution with a genuinely low-latency stateful API surface. Skip it when: you need the largest ecosystem around the engine.